ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
DeviantArt is now a social network. If you hadn't noticed over the past week or so, the site has transitioned from using keywords to describe submissions for search purposes to using hashtags instead. Hashtags. Because Twitter. Because Tumblr. Because Instragram. Because hashtags are universally used as they were originally intended and are not at all abused to make crappy one liners at the end of people's crappy one liners. Because DeviantArt is now a social network.
View the stealth journal describing this stealth change by clicking here!
My thoughts are these: Keywords were not broken, so there was no need to fix them. That's all there really is to it. Beyond signifying a shift in attitude regarding the purpose of this site, these changes make writing out keywords more involved and potentially balloon the number of tags that people have to use to even match the searching efficacy of the previous system.
Example:
Images with the keywords "sumatran tiger" return in searches for three things: sumatran, tiger, and sumatran tiger, organizing results by popularity and by time (and presumably by relevance at least to some extent; if not, then a relevance search is what they *should* be adding instead of hashtags). So as a photographer posting my work, I write only those two keywords, knowing that the system will pull the image back with searches for any combo of those words.
Under the new system, "sumatran tiger" is written #sumatrantiger, which returns results only for images with that exact tag. Now, if someone searches #tiger, missed are all of my tiger photos tagged #sumatrantiger. Missed are the images posted from before this change, because "sumatran tiger" in the keywords before is auto-translated now to "#sumatran #tiger". Data is lost, and the only way that I can adequately cover my bases is to be incredibly redundant with my tags:
Instead of: "sumatran tiger panthera tigris sumatrae",
I write: #sumatrantiger #tiger #sumatran_tiger #panthera #pantheratigris #panthera_tigris #pantheratigrissumatrae #panthera_tigris_sumatrae
And that's only for four of the usually 20-25 terms I put on each of my images. This system seems to promote more generic tags (i.e. #tiger instead of #sumatrantiger) because the more specific ones are more trouble to search for/are likely to yield far fewer results, and the end result of that is that more images get jammed into fewer tags -- a major problem, given that the journal linked above touts this new system as a way to "better surface artwork." All it's going to do is congest searches even more and make it harder for people to get noticed.
And as I mentioned before, because of how the new system operates, tags on all 974 of my previously submitted images are now broken to various degrees, and it's up to me if I want to go back and fix them.
Really an inexplicable change from my point of view. Was this really needed? Does DeviantArt really need to conform to the lowest common denominator to operate? What are your thoughts?
View the stealth journal describing this stealth change by clicking here!
My thoughts are these: Keywords were not broken, so there was no need to fix them. That's all there really is to it. Beyond signifying a shift in attitude regarding the purpose of this site, these changes make writing out keywords more involved and potentially balloon the number of tags that people have to use to even match the searching efficacy of the previous system.
Example:
Images with the keywords "sumatran tiger" return in searches for three things: sumatran, tiger, and sumatran tiger, organizing results by popularity and by time (and presumably by relevance at least to some extent; if not, then a relevance search is what they *should* be adding instead of hashtags). So as a photographer posting my work, I write only those two keywords, knowing that the system will pull the image back with searches for any combo of those words.
Under the new system, "sumatran tiger" is written #sumatrantiger, which returns results only for images with that exact tag. Now, if someone searches #tiger, missed are all of my tiger photos tagged #sumatrantiger. Missed are the images posted from before this change, because "sumatran tiger" in the keywords before is auto-translated now to "#sumatran #tiger". Data is lost, and the only way that I can adequately cover my bases is to be incredibly redundant with my tags:
Instead of: "sumatran tiger panthera tigris sumatrae",
I write: #sumatrantiger #tiger #sumatran_tiger #panthera #pantheratigris #panthera_tigris #pantheratigrissumatrae #panthera_tigris_sumatrae
And that's only for four of the usually 20-25 terms I put on each of my images. This system seems to promote more generic tags (i.e. #tiger instead of #sumatrantiger) because the more specific ones are more trouble to search for/are likely to yield far fewer results, and the end result of that is that more images get jammed into fewer tags -- a major problem, given that the journal linked above touts this new system as a way to "better surface artwork." All it's going to do is congest searches even more and make it harder for people to get noticed.
And as I mentioned before, because of how the new system operates, tags on all 974 of my previously submitted images are now broken to various degrees, and it's up to me if I want to go back and fix them.
Really an inexplicable change from my point of view. Was this really needed? Does DeviantArt really need to conform to the lowest common denominator to operate? What are your thoughts?
Twitter Account Thing
Hey folks,
Been a while since my last journal, so I just wanted to write a quick one to say I'm starting a Twitter account.
https://twitter.com/robbobertphotos
I'll probably try to treat it as a portfolio of sorts, upload some of my better photos and photos that are personal favorites, but it may expand into an alternate gallery in the future. We'll see. If you haven't been watching me here on dA since 2004 or haven't gone back through the roughly 16,000 photos I've posted since then, you might see something over there you haven't seen before. So if you want to follow me there and/or retweet my photos to the winds, that would be awesome. :
Referencing and Redistributing My Work
Because I’ve gotten a few requests, and because I’ve discovered some of my photos on other websites, I decided to go ahead and write a quick journal to let everyone know my stance on referencing and redistributing my work.
Referencing:
I think it’s fantastic that you like my photos enough to draw/paint from them. If you would like to reference one of my photos for your work, feel free! I ask two things:
Please give credit for the reference by linking back to my page or the photo you referenced, and
If you remember, send me a link so I can come see!
tl;dr: Yes!
Redistribution:
I’m a little torn on this one becau
I you haven't already seen this: (Petition)
I don't expect it to do much, if anything, but if you feel strongly that the results of the election in the US don't represent you or the country at-large's values of inclusiveness, acceptance, tolerance, and equality, you might visit the following Change.org link and consider signing the petition:
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19?recruiter=75544430&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink
Again, I don't expect it do much, but it is a way to make your voice heard in the aftermath of this debacle. And don't stop there. If you truly feel abandoned
Ugh
Stop the world. I want to get off.
© 2014 - 2024 robbobert
Comments19
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I just notice this tonight when I posted a photo! I'm so old I don't understand hashtags!